Our Blog

Subscribe to our
Newsletter:

Go to SuccessDiscoveries now!

Learn more about this powerful program for high school and college students

Articles

People scorecards: scoring goals for people and company
(Nov 22 2001 )

By Linda Bilmes


Linda Bilmes is a former assistant secretary of the US Department of Commerce. She takes up a teaching post at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government in January.

The "people scorecard" aims to measure how well companies manage employees It uses a set of criteria that can be tracked and quantified. This helps overcome the problem of companies neglecting human capital because it is difficult to measure and the benefits of people strategy take time to emerge. However, there is growing evidence to link company performance and people management.

An analysis of 200 companies in the US and Germany showed that those that scored highest had a higher total shareholder return than lower-scoring companies.

Further, scores varied wildly.

Third, people-factor benefits take time to emerge. Over four years and longer, a pattern becomes clear, with those companies scoring highest on the scorecard enjoying strong performance versus their competitors. But people-factor companies sometimes forego short-term profits in pursuit of longer-term success. Fourth, companies with high HR scores but low scores for "intrapreneurship" do not have superior stock performance. So, HR should reinforce and foster entrepreneurial opportunity.

A company that does well on all parts of the scorecard seems to translate that into better performance through a more contented and loyal workforce. Features that most increased job satisfaction were: allowing people to influence decisions that affect their work life; training; and performance-linked pay.

Similar factors increased employee loyalty. Employees who agreed with the statement "My company makes it easy for me to put my ideas into practice and to get credit for it" were twice as satisfied, and twice as loyal to their companies, as those who disagreed.

However, a huge gap exists between what companies thought they provided and what workers believed they received. For example, 71 per cent of respondents listed "I am able to influence decisions that affect me" as "very important" - but only 34 per cent of employees agreed that they could do it.

 

Eight steps

Superior stock market performance and the powerful effect on employee morale together create a powerful case for the scorecard. Moreover, the fact that so many workers feel they do not receive people-factor benefits reveals the size of the opportunity. Companies can begin to create an emphasis on people by following eight basic steps:

  • Top-level commitment.
  • Workforce development planning.
  • Develop versatility.
  • Training.
  • Retain good workers.
  • Structure work so that people enjoy it and to foster intrapreneurship.
  • Reward success.
  • Communicate the people factor.

In the current economic climate, managers preoccupied with short-term returns from cost-cutting often run against the grain of the people factor. Companies with the foresight to see beyond immediate difficulties will emerge from the downturn with renewed strength.

This article is drawn from the author's book The People Factor, which will be published by FT Prentice Hall in 2002.

This summary is part of a longer article which can be ordered through back issues of the series (£3 each UK and Ireland; £4 each continental Europe; £5 each rest of world) from Remember When by telephoning +44 (0)20 8763 6363, faxing +44 (0)20 8668 0380 or emailing ft@remember-when.co.uk. The book of Mastering People Management will be published in June 2002 by FT Prentice Hall. Other Mastering books can be ordered at +44 (0)1279 623928 or by visiting www.business-minds.com.

The Nielson Group can be reached at 972.346.2892 or through e-mail at workshops@nielsongroup.com. You can visit The Nielson Group at http://www.nielsongroup.com.



  

Contact: The Nielson Group at 972.346.2892
E-Mail: info@nielsongroup.com